New Idea

IPv6 subdelegation

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea
get an prefixdelegation from an upstream provider (f.e. ISP) and delegate parts of it (f.e. multiple /60 from a /56 or /48) to other routers. like asked here: https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/IPv6-56-assigned-by-dhcpv6-pd-to-Main-network-router-and-sub/td-p/1174595 and here https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/IPv6-dhcp-pd-shorter-prefix-than-64/m-p/2420214

Upgrade Linux kernel to at least 4.4

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

There are a number of requests that depend on having firmware based on a newer Linux kernel. The 3.10 series kernel is already EOL as of Nov. 5, 2017 (a couple of weeks prior to this posting) and not recommended for use by its maintainer, even if it were upgraded to the latest 3.10.108 instead of the current 3.10.14:

 

https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/4/178

 

As I understand it, there are challenges to upgrading the EdgeOS kernel due to dependencies on the Cavium and MediaTek SDKs, as well as UnionFS support not being in newer kernels. It should be possible to overcome each of these things with some effort and investment, and it's a requirement for keeping the EdgeOS platform relevant.

 

This request originally came about because of an effort to include the Cake shaper, which would bring a real improvement for control of latency under load as compared to the currently shipped fq_codel. Cake has been compiled for EdgeOS, but is very difficult to keep backported to the 3.10 series:

 

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Feature-Requests/Cake-shaper-support/idi-p/1885749

 

However, a newer kernel is also necessary to maintain a secure, stable and performant platform in general. The 4.4 kernel series has a projected long-term EOL of Feb, 2022, and thus might be a good minimum version to target.

Integrate dnscrypt into local resolver

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

Basically looking to have this functionality be available from the GUI:

 

https://techsmix.net/dnscrypt-on-the-edgerouter-lite/

 

I'd like to be able to have the following:

- Clients on LAN (including multiple VLANs) use the EdgeRouter for DNS

- EdgeRouter registers DHCP and other static entries in local DNS database (for split DNS)

- All other queries that would go to an external resolver instead go through DNSCrypt, which has its own config for what resolver(s) it will use

SNMP VRRP support via IETF standard VRRP-MIB

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

Hello,

 

It would be great if there was a way to monitor the status of VRRP natively ... why not use IETF standard VRRP-MIB?

 

The basis for this idea is here: https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeRouter/SNMP-OIDs-to-monitor-VRRP/m-p/2383558#M211485

 

thank you!

 

James

Visio Stencils

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

The new Visio stencils that are provided by UBNT are not good.  The community made stencils are much better.  Please update the Visio stencils with real and accurate representation of the UBNT products.

Send DPI statistics to UniFi controller.

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

Please allow for DPI data to be sent to the UniFi controller. I do not need to be able to make any changes from UniFi. I would just like to populate DPI statistics.

Firewall Rule Delete Display Change

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

Would it be possible to change the firewall rule delete confirmation to include the rule description along with the number?  For those of us with hundreds or thousand of rules to manage it would make things a little easier to  have one last piece of confirmation that we're deleting the proper rule besides just the number.  I think it would help new users too.

 

Also a similar warning/confirmation on the DNAT and SNAT rules would really help.

IPsec VTI with dynamic IP address

Submitted by -
Status: Duplicate

Hello,

 

it would be nice, if it is possible to use VTI with dynamic IP addresses.

 

I've multiple customers with dynamic IP internet access and want to migrate them from MikroTik to EdgeRouter.

 

Regards,

Martin

SSL certs from https://letsencrypt.org

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

I really would liek to see the end of Self-signed certs and implemnetion of https://letsencrypt.org for EdgeOS.

This would be great move in right direction for out of the box SSL.

 

Simply to Use Block/Black List for Emerging Threats using Multiple Sources (e.g. Spamhaus)

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

I believe there are various threads in the EdgeMax forum discussing and making available various scripts to auto-populate and compile list of networks and addresses from various reliable sources such as SpamHaus to block.

 

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/Using-spamhaus-lists/td-p/578909

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX/Emerging-Threats-Blacklist/td-p/645375

 

Is it possible for UBNT to consider making this a feature available to all users who may not be skilled enough to do so manually?

EdgeOS as a VM

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

Hello,

 

we currently run vyos as a vm in our infrusturcture. (in a commercial setting) while vyos is a great router os, lack of commercial support or fulltime development means it lacks a steady relase cycle.

 

before vyos, we used vyatta with much success. unfortunately brocade saw things differently, and sought to overprice vrouter and effectivly end all suport for the community edition. With the commercial edition restricively expensive we moved to vyos.

 

if Ubnt were willing to release a commercial edition of edgeos AS A VM with either a licenseing option or by purchasing a hardware router with the ability to 'migrate' the serial number to a vm etc. we would be the first to purchase it.

 

i know this has been asked before, however knowing that ubnt has hired a few of the previous dev team at vyatta, i feel this would be a nice homage to their roots of the USG, Edgerouter, and edgeswitch lines. 

 

 

EDIT: If ubnt would like to support the large enterprise and carriers  a VM is a must. alot of these types of infrustructures already have a full Hypervisor cluster in place which has much higher levels of redundancy than a single hardware appliance can provide.

many of the top network vendors have this already, from Cisco, to Fortinet, to Juniper. if UBNT wants to gain market share against those brands this would be a fairly easy way to do so with very litle R&D cost, as compared to a hardware device.

Disabling a port on an EdgeRouter should bring the ethernet carrier down.

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

Currently on all EdgeRouters, disabling a port, leaves the ethernet carrier up and the lights continue to blink.

In the case of EdgeRouters with switch chips, data continues to pass through the switch on disabled ports assigned to a switch.  On routed ports (not on a switch), the routing is stopped, but ethernet hardware kept up on both ethernet and SFP ports. 

 

 

The desired behavior is to drop the hardware ethernet carrier state when a port is disabled.  This allows quick ospf triggering of port down state and is common sense behavior when someone plugs a cable into a disabled port.

 

 

 

For those with alpha forum access, see also here:

 

 

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/EdgeMAX-Alpha-NDA/Should-disabling-an-interface-drop-the-ethernet-connection/m-p/2130148#M5922

Customized factory default config

Submitted by -

For MSP (Managed Service Providers) I'd love to see option for customizing factory default config.

Currently after factory reset /root.dev/config.boot.default config shipped with the firmware is applied. Unfortunately, some customers love to push buttons and reset devices to factory defaults when they encounter any problem. Having a customized factory config would restore router to MSP pre-sets and bing it back to life.

 

One quite easy solution is to let the MSP create  /root.dev/config.boot.default and during factory reset router will check if it exists and apply it instead of /opt/vyatta/etc/config.boot.default (as a fail-safe there can be a counter that this can be done only twice and then /opt/vyatta/etc/config.boot.default will be applied on third try).

VXLAN Support in EdgeOS

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

I don't see a feature request for VXLAN on Edge, just UniFi, so here it is.

L2TP over IPSec client implementation

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

Dear all,

 

I would like to see the feature implemented of having an L2TP over IPSec client running on the EdgeRouter. We have serval instances where we need this for client implementation where native IPSec to IPSec is due to technical restriction on the remote end is not an option. My thoughts to the features would be:

- ideally configurable via GUI

- define specific remote networks for routing (or have them advertised by head-end)

- status shown in vpn section

 

I have also seen some others asking for such a solution in the forums, so I am hoping for some support for this implementation request.

 

Kind regards,

 

Edge2Unifi

Update to OpenVPN 2.4.x on Edgerouter

Submitted by -
Status: Accepted

Please update the OpenVPN version as the current server only supports TLS 1.0)

 

Thanks

Add Qualcomm Fast Path support

Submitted by -
Status: Accepted

It seems the Qualcomm Fast Path module improves the performance a lot.

 

It will be great if this can be added into EdgeOS.

 

See also:

https://forum.lede-project.org/t/qualcomm-fast-path-for-lede/4582

ubnt switch POE + SFP+

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

it would be nice to produce a swtich with 2 port of sfp+ can power the AP's ( PoE )

with this 3 verions :

1- PoE 8gb ports + 2 ports SFP+

2- PoE 16gb ports + 2 ports SFP+

3- PoE 24gb ports + 2 ports SFP+

 

because i cant buy ES-48-750W  to power my WISP i dont need 48 port i just need 8 ports

 

thank u in advance

QinQ VLANs - IEEE 802.1ad

Submitted by -

Requesting the addition of QinQing per IEEE 802.1ad to the edgeswitch line. This is a crucial feature for service providers and would be very helpful with GPON deployments. 

Unbound for DNS

Submitted by -
Status: New Idea

There is many reason's to use Unbound for DNS over dnsmasq, and I will list the most common