06-26-2018 01:51 AM
08-07-2018 10:32 PM
ok so we a new wisp thats installed UCRM and really liking it although we need the UNMS but was hoping that it would have been intergrated in UCRM by now how soon will it be intergrated or should I just install UNMS seprately for now?
08-08-2018 01:56 AM
09-10-2018 04:53 AM
09-17-2018 07:26 AM
Not to beat a dead horse, but is this notion of integration really going to happen? I'm relatively new to the Ubiquiti world, and I've been tasked with setting up both UCRM and UNMS, but it seems horribly unproductive to have to do much of the exact same work twice.
It frightens me that these topics have been being discussed for years. Will these two solutions ever play nicely with one another?
09-18-2018 02:42 AM
UNMS was introduced last year and was flooded by requests, more and more HW became supported by UNMS since then. Now, it makes perfect sense to integrate both tools and use and combine their advantages. We are now working intensively on that integration, we hope that we will be able to provide some beta version during this autumn.
09-27-2018 06:50 AM
I’ve had a similar discussion like this before but do you think in future/current UCRM releases it would be possible to suspend clients where their CPE is in bridge mode? From what I understand today, all CPEs must be a router for the clients in order for suspension to work. This adds an unnecessary extra NAT and provisioning hassle for scenarios where the CPE may want a public IP.
It’s a lot easier from a management perspective to have all CPEs in bridge mode but we need a way to enforce suspension with this setup and suspension needs to support the potential for multiple client “Service IPs” attached to one service.
09-27-2018 07:33 AM
09-27-2018 07:34 AM
09-27-2018 07:43 AM - edited 09-27-2018 05:57 PM
If it wasn't obvious, uCRM should send a ping to the radios, where we should add new firmware to all customer CPE's so that the suspension is done on the radio, not our core routers, so there's less firewall rules to process leaving more resources free on the core router
I like the idea of pushing the suspension function back into the network. Need to retain access to UCRM so the customer can make a payment, which (assuming this is done on airOS) would require adding firewall rules (both IPv4 and IPv6) to the CPE radio in order to limit allowable destination IP(s).
Setting those rules at the tower router might be another option.
09-27-2018 06:58 PM
09-28-2018 08:53 AM
10-09-2018 09:03 AM - edited 10-09-2018 09:04 AM
A few of the things I've noticed that throw errors on UNMS imports are commas ANYWHERE and if the site name doesn't exactly match the site name that has already been created on client imports, it seems to skip that import altogether, no error, but no client either.
10-10-2018 12:14 AM
However, we are currently working on the integration of both tools and soon it will be possible to merge their data.