03-04-2019 04:16 PM
Upgraded an ER-X today from v1.10.8 to (accidentally) v2.0.0-beta3, then again to v1.10.9. When I look at the UNMS backups, I see:
Is there some reason all of these filenames have 1-10-9 in their name instead of the appropriate version numbers (from which they were created)?
03-07-2019 07:26 AM