Move WANs into Networks for improved flexibility

Submitted by -
Status: Implemented

Move WAN configuration into Networks section to improve flexibility, so interface purposes aren't fixed. e.g. allow WAN2 port to be configured as a LAN if desired, allow multiple VLAN config on a WAN, etc.

Comments
by Ubiquiti Employee
on ‎01-19-2017 05:02 AM
@panthergm not sure which part you're talking about, the request here is to allow using any interface for any purpose (LAN or WAN), rather than forcing LAN or WAN usage for each NIC.
by
on ‎02-22-2017 09:47 AM
Would really like to see all 4 ports on the USG Pro configurable as WAN or LAN and link SPF ports either way. I have 24 port Unifi switches that connect via SFP but I have to go back to copper to get to a USG. Honestly, not sure why it's not 1 WAN Link to an SFP and 1 LAN linked to an SFP out of the gate, you put SFP on the switches.
by
on ‎05-10-2017 02:05 PM

@UBNT-cmb any update or ETA on this feature? I'm really looking forward to this and would love to have a guestimate of when we might be able to use the SFP ports to run to our USW or a USW-XG

by
on ‎05-24-2017 07:34 AM

+1 would like to see this feature

by
on ‎09-18-2017 10:40 AM

@UBNT-cmb any update on when this will be implemented? Have a project that will require this feature.

by
‎09-27-2017 08:05 PM - edited ‎09-27-2017 08:06 PM

@brycew Mee too.

I think that didn't makes sense, the SFP port be a only WAN mode.
The option for configure that LAN, Link Aggregation, and other functions are important in my point of view.

 

https://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi-Routing-Switching/USG-PRO-SFP-Ports-for-LAN/td-p/1488762/page/2

 

my 10 cents

 

Regards

by
on ‎10-02-2017 03:13 PM

@UBNT-MikeD @UBNT-cmb Any update on this feature and when it will be available?

by
on ‎10-03-2017 12:13 AM

This would be brilliant. The USG Pro really does need the SFP slots to be assignable to either WAN or LAN. 

by
on ‎10-10-2017 01:53 AM
I need this to defend the use of Ubnt.
by
on ‎10-20-2017 07:58 PM

A year has passed and this is still not implemented?